View Full Version : Sex with your MP
Xhaka Can’t
31-05-2011, 01:25 PM
http://sexymp.co.uk/
Mine's at #16
Cripps_orig
31-05-2011, 01:39 PM
568
# 33.
All MP's a fugly anyway.
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/03_03/beckettDM0104_228x346.jpg
:sick:
Toronto Gooner
31-05-2011, 03:09 PM
LDG,
You should check out some of the Canadian MPs. The U.K. has them beaten hands down.
Toronto Gooner
31-05-2011, 03:13 PM
http://sexymp.co.uk/
Mine's at #16
My M.P. is Peter Kent, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kent
Niall_Quinn
31-05-2011, 03:14 PM
Is it mindlessly violent sex resulting in a fatality or just normal sex? The latter would be pretty disgusting tbh. Yuck!
Joker
31-05-2011, 07:56 PM
Luciana Berger's quite fit. Can't say the same about any of the others though.
The Wengerbabies
31-05-2011, 08:11 PM
Andrew Lansley :bow:
Joker
31-05-2011, 08:27 PM
Andrew Lansley :bow:
He's going to get sacked soon I think.
fakeyank
31-05-2011, 08:32 PM
Dont have an MP here :(
The Wengerbabies
31-05-2011, 09:30 PM
He's going to get sacked soon I think.
Aye because he's sticking to his guns over his health care reforms, which it has to be said are a good set of proposals.
He'll still be my MP though, just not health secretary meaning more time for his constituents ##
Xhaka Can’t
31-05-2011, 09:37 PM
Aye because he's sticking to his guns over his health care reforms, which it has to be said are a good set of proposals.
He'll still be my MP though, just not health secretary meaning more time for his constituents ##
Thanks for seeing through the fog created by those left wing nuts at the BMA and informing me of this. But just so I can impress my co-workers tomorrow, could you please expand a tad on what benefits will be realized by his 'good set of proposals' and how quickly we can expect to enjoy them?
The Wengerbabies
31-05-2011, 09:39 PM
Thanks for seeing through the fog created by those left wing nuts at the BMA and informing me of this. But just so I can impress my co-workers tomorrow, could you please expand a tad on what benefits will be realized by his 'good set of proposals' and how quickly we can expect to benefit from them?
You know full well I have no idea what his proposals are. But he came up with them so they must be good, he's awesome tbf, thats why I voted for him.
Xhaka Can’t
31-05-2011, 09:40 PM
You know full well I have no idea what his proposals are. But he came up with them so they must be good, he's awesome tbf, thats why I voted for him.
:lol:
Niall_Quinn
31-05-2011, 10:04 PM
Aye because he's sticking to his guns over his health care reforms, which it has to be said are a good set of proposals.
He'll still be my MP though, just not health secretary meaning more time for his constituents ##
Whaaa....WTF!!?? The guy's a stooge for the private health industry FFS! Good set of proposals? Handing the whole fucking health service over to a bunch of cunts who want to corner the market on human suffering? Is that the "doing good for citizens" shit you are talking about? Now I'm not a NHS knee-jerker where even the hint of providing a decent service gets me marching with the union fat-cat bastards, but I can spot a fucking profiteer and plunderer a mile off. Yes, he's your MP, congratulations. You refurbished his fucking house in the country, remember (or are you wealthy enough to not pay taxes)? But what has he done for you lately? Jesus, how far up does it have to go before it wipes the love off your face?
Flavs
01-06-2011, 07:34 AM
19th Rachel Reeves
Flavs
01-06-2011, 07:35 AM
Andrew Lansley :bow:
I had a ten minte meeting with him a couple of weeks ago, it lasted 6 minutes
Me :bow:
Joker
01-06-2011, 11:28 AM
Whaaa....WTF!!?? The guy's a stooge for the private health industry FFS! Good set of proposals? Handing the whole fucking health service over to a bunch of cunts who want to corner the market on human suffering? Is that the "doing good for citizens" shit you are talking about? Now I'm not a NHS knee-jerker where even the hint of providing a decent service gets me marching with the union fat-cat bastards, but I can spot a fucking profiteer and plunderer a mile off. Yes, he's your MP, congratulations. You refurbished his fucking house in the country, remember (or are you wealthy enough to not pay taxes)? But what has he done for you lately? Jesus, how far up does it have to go before it wipes the love off your face?
Exactly, the main actors pursuing this reform are affected by so many different conflicts of interest. For example, the Lansley's wife owns a company that advises private drugs companies, and is responsible for "helping the private sector talk to and influence the public sector more effectively.”
http://liberalconspiracy.org/2011/05/23/andrew-lansley-and-his-wife-a-conflict-of-interest/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2011/02/05/health-secretary-andrew-lansely-s-wife-advises-junk-food-and-drugs-firms-115875-22899966/
Here's a diagram that exposes the extensive level of lobbying and covert pressure that is exerted on this government by private interests looking to line their pockets.
http://www.leftfootforward.org/images/2011/04/Private_Healthcare_Network_SpinWatch1.jpg
The Wengerbabies
01-06-2011, 11:30 AM
Whaaa....WTF!!?? The guy's a stooge for the private health industry FFS! Good set of proposals? Handing the whole fucking health service over to a bunch of cunts who want to corner the market on human suffering? Is that the "doing good for citizens" shit you are talking about? Now I'm not a NHS knee-jerker where even the hint of providing a decent service gets me marching with the union fat-cat bastards, but I can spot a fucking profiteer and plunderer a mile off. Yes, he's your MP, congratulations. You refurbished his fucking house in the country, remember (or are you wealthy enough to not pay taxes)? But what has he done for you lately? Jesus, how far up does it have to go before it wipes the love off your face?
Privatisation is the way forward, you get what you deserve.
Exactly, the main actors pursuing this reform are affected by so many different conflicts of interest. For example, the Lansley's wife owns a company that advises private drugs companies, and is responsible for "helping the private sector talk to and influence the public sector more effectively.”
http://liberalconspiracy.org/2011/05/23/andrew-lansley-and-his-wife-a-conflict-of-interest/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2011/02/05/health-secretary-andrew-lansely-s-wife-advises-junk-food-and-drugs-firms-115875-22899966/
Any impartial sources? No, didn't think so.
Flavs
01-06-2011, 11:32 AM
Privatisation is the way forward, you get what you deserve.
:haha:
But no, really it isnt
Joker
01-06-2011, 11:33 AM
Privatisation is the way forward, you get what you deserve.
Any impartial sources? No, didn't think so.
The sources may not be impartial as such, but the information is accurate. This is why you will never get a conservative government represent the interests of the people. The majority of the MPs are so close to private sector interests and so susceptible to lobbying, that most of their policies are designed to benefit those who line their palms with party donations. The whole thing stinks tbh.
Munchies
01-06-2011, 11:35 AM
Mines at 133 http://sexymp.co.uk/mp/312.jpg ....
The Wengerbabies
01-06-2011, 11:35 AM
The sources may not be impartial as such, but the information is accurate. This is why you will never get a conservative government represent the interests of the people. The majority of the MPs are so close to private sector interests and so susceptible to lobbying, that most of their policies are designed to benefit those who line their palms with party donations. The whole thing stinks tbh.
They're representing my interests pretty well.
All MPs have their own agenda its not fair to single out Tories, they're all as bad as each other imo.
Joker
01-06-2011, 11:36 AM
Privatisation is the way forward, you get what you deserve.
Privatisation of the rail network has been an unmitigated disaster. Moreover, the so called "efficiency" gains never materialised. With the public utilities, all we have experienced is soaring energy prices, shoddy provision of services while the company owners line their pockets with gold. The same with the telecommunications industry.
Privatisation is based purely on free market dogma, and the belief that private = good, and public = bad.
cricketsi
02-06-2011, 10:59 AM
Luciana Berger's quite fit. Can't say the same about any of the others though.
It's almost like you just chose the top ranked (non-Conservative) Labour MP. Mostly dominated by the Conservatives at the top, maybe that was a key election campaign strategy - choose the prettier candidate.
Also, a very disproportionate number of Scots and NI MPs at the bottom. Ugly countries, clearly.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.