Parents of the Year

[Letters]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-21875816

:rolleyes:

[GP]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8z8ygrDSWU

[Injury Time]

I thought you were referring too http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22003165

[Syn]

I can't be the only person who - after watching that Jeremy Kyle vid that GP posted - thinks the father did quite well against Jeremy Kyle. Kyle seemed like the bigger twat. I'm not too interested in the burning down of the house and all that, it's obviously pretty grim stuff. But the way the newspapers, Jeremy Kyle, the crowd...everyone...were having a go at the seemingly happy 'family' for basically polygamy. Where's all this outrage against the scores of muslim families that have the same deal? Why isn't Jeremy Kyle calling those men 'sexist' as well? There's obviously no fuss because they're scared of being called racists and ignorant of different beliefs. What about these guys' beliefs?

Either effectively having two wives and a bunch of kids is fair game or it isn't. Not that I'd want it myself but I'm fine with the idea of it as long as everyone's happy. Whether kids grow up with a mum and a dad, two mums and a dad, two dads, two mums...it's all good as long as they make sure the kids have a good childhood. Obviously it didn't work out this time because the dad ended up being little bit psychopath.

[Niall_Quinn]

I can't be the only person who - after watching that Jeremy Kyle vid that GP posted - thinks the father did quite well against Jeremy Kyle. Kyle seemed like the bigger twat. I'm not too interested in the burning down of the house and all that, it's obviously pretty grim stuff. But the way the newspapers, Jeremy Kyle, the crowd...everyone...were having a go at the seemingly happy 'family' for basically polygamy. Where's all this outrage against the scores of muslim families that have the same deal? Why isn't Jeremy Kyle calling those men 'sexist' as well? There's obviously no fuss because they're scared of being called racists and ignorant of different beliefs. What about these guys' beliefs?

Either effectively having two wives and a bunch of kids is fair game or it isn't. Not that I'd want it myself but I'm fine with the idea of it as long as everyone's happy. Whether kids grow up with a mum and a dad, two mums and a dad, two dads, two mums...it's all good as long as they make sure the kids have a good childhood. Obviously it didn't work out this time because the dad ended up being little bit psychopath.

Give a TV audience the chance to do their reality mob thing and they'll burn a witch every time. It's demeaning for all concerned, including the viewer. A slice of America here in the UK, how did we ever get along without it?

[WMUG]

But it's not natural!

[Injury Time]

But it's not natural!

Get back into your closet hetrobasher!

;)

[Xhaka Can’t]

I doubt he's ever bashed anything.

[Injury Time]

I doubt he's ever bashed anything.

Not even "the bishop"?

[Niall_Quinn]

But it's not natural!

It's possible to fuck without getting shit all over the place, believe it or not.

[Letters]

But it's not natural!

Do you think what is 'natural', i.e. occurs in nature, is a good benchmark for human behaviour?

Admittedly I don't lick my balls in public mostly because I physically can't, but I don't think the fact that dogs do makes it fair game.

[WMUG]

Do you think what is 'natural', i.e. occurs in nature, is a good benchmark for human behaviour?

Admittedly I don't lick my balls in public mostly because I physically can't, but I don't think the fact that dogs do makes it fair game.

Well, if you're getting in on the act of derailing your own thread...

I wasn't talking about what happens in public. Whatever decision people make regarding their own private lives, be it having a polyamourous relationship or whatever, is fine. I wouldn't want to be in one, but if somebody does, then meh. WFYB.

Regarding the 'natural' side of things, the word 'unnatural' is an incorrect concept. Humans, and anything we do, are a part of nature which, to quote a great man, encompasses all of existence. Anything that happens within that frame is, by definition, natural.

[Niall_Quinn]

An "incorrect" concept :haha:

I'm using that one.

[McNamara That Ghost...]

http://i2.cdnds.net/13/14/618x829/daily-mail.jpg

Daily Mail. :rolleyes:

[Niall_Quinn]

Sunshine days for the Daily Hitler and the Bullingdon boys. Final proof that all poor people are scum. Let the purges begin.

[WMUG]

Does anybody actually find the stuff they print anything other than repulsive?

[Niall_Quinn]

Does anybody actually find the stuff they print anything other than repulsive?

Even their recipes by Nigella ****flap are repulsive.

[Injury Time]

http://i2.cdnds.net/13/14/618x829/daily-mail.jpg

Daily Mail. :rolleyes:

Even his son behind him is giving him a "wanker" sign!

[Letters]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-22023117

“Philpott's sister, Dawn Bestwick, shouted "Die, Mick, die" from the public gallery as he was taken down.”


I didn't know she spoke German.

[Cripps_orig]

Not been following this. Don't watch the news or read the papers and cba reading articles online.

Someone post a summary

[Niall_Quinn]

Not been following this. Don't watch the news or read the papers and cba reading articles online.

Someone post a summary

Cameron the whore has been ordered by his masters to steal from the poor and give to the rich. In typical fashion he's using division to force this injustice through, turning those that have against those that do not. The idea is that anyone who has been fucked over by criminal banks and associated corporations is an immoral sponger or a filthy foreigner here to steal from privileged white people. Of course the Daily Hitler is leading the charge as usual (even outstripping the Sun) and stories like this (which in no way represents even a tiny fraction of the population) are being trumpeted to demonstrate just how awful the poor really are.

Or for the even shorter version: Tories are being Tories.

[Niall_Quinn]

Scum rat bastard arse gaping queer whore boy Osborne cashing in on this big time. Hopefully he dies before he kills too many old people, robs too many working people or deprives too many young people.

This philpott **** killed six kids. Tragic of course and he's been punished. Shame the death pen has been abolished.

But what about Cameron and Osborne? How many kids ave they slaughtered? Many, many, all so their paymasters can run drugs. Where's the justice when it comes to these sub human bastards?

[Letters]

Making up stuff ftw

[Xhaka Can’t]

Making up stuff ftw

Are you going to now defend what Osborn came out with, suggesting that the horrific case of child killer Mick Philpott strengthened the case for further reforms of the welfare system?

Do you not think that is fucking sick?

[Xhaka Can’t]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/563734_10151588598250948_1888549081_n.jpg

[Niall_Quinn]

Making up stuff ftw

Are you referring to the mysterious case of opium production in Afghanistan being at an all time high since the "liberators" went into to "destroy" what had already been mostly destroyed, or are you referring to the way Cameron and Osborne sat on their hands while the war criminal Blair lied the nation into wars with Afghanistan and Iraq? Even the rabid warmongers accept 100K+ men women and children were slaughtered in those wars. Institutions with less vested interests put the numbers at 1M+. Millions more made into refugees. Or was all that Mick whatshisname's fault too?

The killing of six kids for personal gain is foul in the extreme. The way we ignore the killing of kids further away is just as foul and just as extreme.

[GP]

Brown kids don't count, tbh

[Shaqiri Is Boss]

This week the Mail was slated for making the perfectly reasonable point that arson killer Mick Philpott was a product of the benefits system. Today it is George Osborne's turn. Now tell us what YOU think. But, beware, the Left WILL try to hijack the result

:rolleyes:

[McNamara That Ghost...]

:lol:

Tell us what you think, unless it's what we don't want to hear.

[Letters]

He should be killed though. :shrug:

#spiritofchristianlove

[Shaqiri Is Boss]

Is there still a "prisoner's code" [if there ever was one] where he'll get his head caved in?

I wouldn't be against that...

[Niall_Quinn]

:rolleyes:

They must be seriously worried if they are asking their readers to think.

[Shaqiri Is Boss]

They must be seriously worried if they are asking their readers to think.
Liebour. Bliar. Lefty socialist conspiracy. BBC. EUSSR. Immigrants.

Just about covers it...

[Niall_Quinn]

Liebour. Bliar. Lefty socialist conspiracy. BBC. EUSSR. Immigrants.

Just about covers it...

And worshipping the royals and what the royals are wearing and how the royal palaces will be decorated? Pay attention please!

[Letters]

Royals :bow:

Gawd bless 'em

[WMUG]

An "incorrect" concept :haha:

I'm using that one.
Not heard that phrase before?

[Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie]

I think it's a case of mistaking ignorance for just not caring.

[Niall_Quinn]

Or a case of contrived mathematics.

( 30,000 x 365 ) + ( politics x media ) = 0
Therefore: 6 > 10,950,000

[The Emirates Gallactico]

Absolutely disgusting how the Toryscum, Daily Mail and The Sun are trying to use this to attack all welfare recipients and low income families.

Sad thing is that all their readers in my area are lapping it up.

[Niall_Quinn]

I see the royal welfare recipients got another multi million quid handout.

[Letters]

Yes, because they generate no interest in the country or income at all.

[Niall_Quinn]

Yes, because they generate no interest in the country or income at all.

LOL, seriously though.

The script here is everyone who gets any form of assistance from the state is scum. Circumstances should not be considered, stereotyping is all that's required. So on that basis, the royal leeches, the banksters, the corporations on huge state handouts - we're all in this together aren't we? Dave said so. Let's use the same paint brush then.

[Injury Time]

I thought you were referring too http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22003165


I see the royal welfare recipients got another multi million quid handout.
Extra £5m, we're in this together :rolleyes:

[IBK]

Yes, because they generate no interest in the country or income at all.

Logic doesn't apply when the revolution comes.

[Niall_Quinn]

Logic doesn't apply when the revolution comes.

Royal welfare is now a matter of logic? The royal argument is anything but logical, it's a preposterous reinforcement of the trickle down theory whereby the activities of the super wealthy (supposedly by default) filter down to those who generate the useful goods and services in our economy. And of course there isn't a single shred of evidence, here or in any other country outside South America, to demonstrate this benevolent flow. In fact all the evidence clearly shows the wealth gap growing at an ever accelerating rate. The only logic that can truly be applied is the conclusion the more you give to the super wealthy the less everyone else has, the opposite of Letter's apology.

Even then you could just say that's always the way it has been. Not true in detail but as a general principle accurate enough. Better then if the recipients of the largest welfare cheques of all (by several magnitudes) did not make claims they were toughing out recession with the rest of us. And better still if the Daily Mail would be content with facilitating the robbery of the poor for the benefit of the super rich without vilifying the victims in the process. It may be the cherry on their icing on their cake, the final humiliation of the vanquished, but it's not strictly necessary.

[IBK]

Originally Posted by IBK
Logic doesn't apply when the revolution comes.
Royal welfare is now a matter of logic? The royal argument is anything but logical, it's a preposterous reinforcement of the trickle down theory whereby the activities of the super wealthy (supposedly by default) filter down to those who generate the useful goods and services in our economy. And of course there isn't a single shred of evidence, here or in any other country outside South America, to demonstrate this benevolent flow. In fact all the evidence clearly shows the wealth gap growing at an ever accelerating rate. The only logic that can truly be applied is the conclusion the more you give to the super wealthy the less everyone else has, the opposite of Letter's apology.

Even then you could just say that's always the way it has been. Not true in detail but as a general principle accurate enough. Better then if the recipients of the largest welfare cheques of all (by several magnitudes) did not make claims they were toughing out recession with the rest of us. And better still if the Daily Mail would be content with facilitating the robbery of the poor for the benefit of the super rich without vilifying the victims in the process. It may be the cherry on their icing on their cake, the final humiliation of the vanquished, but it's not strictly necessary.

[Niall_Quinn]

Ah, online discussion malfunction. My default position on GW is to assume sarcasm in any given response. I sometimes get caught out by genuine material.

[GP]

Mick Philpot is a cunt

[Cripps_orig]

Cameron the whore has been ordered by his masters to steal from the poor and give to the rich. In typical fashion he's using division to force this injustice through, turning those that have against those that do not. The idea is that anyone who has been fucked over by criminal banks and associated corporations is an immoral sponger or a filthy foreigner here to steal from privileged white people. Of course the Daily Hitler is leading the charge as usual (even outstripping the Sun) and stories like this (which in no way represents even a tiny fraction of the population) are being trumpeted to demonstrate just how awful the poor really are.

Or for the even shorter version: Tories are being Tories.
Can someone post a summary of the summary?

[Niall_Quinn]

Can someone post a summary of the summary?

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/a433/qwerty12343/cameron-dog-turd_zps7f0c70d6.jpg