"Currants Bw..."

[Niall_Quinn]

So let me see if I've got this right. The whole thing was rigged so that Trump couldn't win, wouldn't be allowed to win according to Assange, and now Trump has won it's because of vote rigging for Trump.

Nooooooo.

Assange's personal opinions have absolutely no connection to the result of the election. I wonder what strange and convoluted point people are trying to make when they raise this? Possibly it's some attempt to suggest that because Assange's personal opinions are incorrect therefore the mountain of evidence dumped on the criminal Clinton is incorrect. Not so. The two things aren't related.

And vote rigging is a standard part of the US election, ever since the Bush gang started running and probably well before that. This time the Bush gang were working for Killary. The amusing aspect of this is the Repugs conducted their rigging operations on the basis Cruz would be running. But the stupid bastards ended up helping Trump

[Letters]

Any basis for the assertion about vote rigging?

[Niall_Quinn]

Any basis for the assertion about vote rigging?

Yes, I use facts as a basis.

These facts are easy to find but if you need I can spoon feed you, just ask.

[Letters]

if you need I can spoon feed you, just ask.

Yes please.

[Niall_Quinn]

Yes please.

Well I guess I'll have to supply a mainstream source or else you'll be incapable of accepting the information on its merits. So the best source for this would be Greg Palast who has been tracking US election fraud for several cycles now.

Gregory Allyn "Greg" Palast (born June 26, 1952)[1] is a New York Times-bestselling author[2] and a freelance journalist for the BBC[3] as well as the British newspaper The Guardian.[4] His work frequently focuses on corporate malfeasance but has also been known to work with labor unions and consumer advocacy groups.

He'll give you a solid grounding on the various rigging techniques. Probably start with this cycle and Operation Crosscheck.
http://www.gregpalast.com/rolling-st...an-steal-vote/

For centralised rigging methods using the electronic voting machines see BlackBoxVoting.org, another operation that has been tracking vote rigging through several cycles: http://blackboxvoting.org/

After those two you should have more than enough information to dig deeper if you are so inclined.

[Power n Glory]

I didn't compare your performance to that of the mainstream media because you don't understand the subject and therefore don't have a position, I made the comparison based on your willingness to take a statement, change it or place it out of context and then criticise it. I'm fine with my position thanks but if you find the time to do anything other than bluster around then I'm willing to listen to your ideas.

Still deflecting. Come on NQ. You can do better than that. Don't have a position on what? I understand the contradiction presented no matter how you try to spin it.

[Kano]

Surely Michael Moore is overdue a heart attack?

[Niall_Quinn]

I like Matt Taibbi, he's a good investigative journalist. But like most of the media he's so butt hurt at the moment that he can't see straight. He clings to the notion that Republicans quietly accepting mass immigration because they are junkies for cheap or slave labour or Democrats preferring it because it seals in an ever growing vote is some sort of "conspiracy theory" when it is far easier to examine the evidence and see the crappy jobs, the multi-job families, the densely packed immigrant ghettos at in the urban centres. And what about the "conspiracy theory" of the bankster bailouts? The evidence of collusion and corruption at the heart pf the establishment is overwhelming and yet the media still pretends it can't see it. Of course they can see it because they are part of it and that's the real reason why these things go unmentioned. Taibbi, up until this point, has not been afraid to delve into reality. But it seems reality is getting a bit too real these days.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...-wrong-w449783

[Niall_Quinn]

Still deflecting. Come on NQ. You can do better than that. Don't have a position on what? I understand the contradiction presented no matter how you try to spin it.

I've very clearly stated my own opinion but not only do you refuse to address it, you've busied yourself changing it. And you have no opinion of your own on the matter. So I'm wondering what it is you are bringing to this debate? Not much.

There is no spin whatsoever on my part. I have stated my position clearly and more than once. If you feel there's a contradiction in that position then point it out. So far all you have done is change what I have said and then run off on some outraged tangent. So now try sticking to what I have said, point out the contradiction clearly and let's see if we can take it from there.

[Niall_Quinn]

Here's the left wing media's reporting of the violent protests taking place in the States right now as "Democrats" protest the outcome of a democratic election. Jeez, is this funny or not funny? I can't figure it out. There are a 1,001 useful things these turds could be protesting but instead they are crying about the very system they all sing and dance about right up until the point it delivers a result they don't want to see.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...hreats-w449787

Remind anyone of the post Brexit nonsense? A desperate cataloguing of the everyday incidents that unfortunately occur in every country, normally not even reported on a national level but now spun up into a crisis. And in 2 weeks? Well we have the advantage here in the UK of knowing what happens in 2 weeks. It all goes back to normal. Fucking stupid libtards. If you don't like democracy then don't endorse it you fucking morons.