"Currants Bw..."

[Cripps]

A bit like Wenger then... outdated and not in touch with the modern era...

[Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie]

Where do you think illegal weapons come from? From gun stores, maybe under the counter? They come from the black market, from those who don't obey the law and so won't be affected by the law. Where did ISIS get its guns? Who is the biggest customer for black market guns, going all the way back through the decades? I most certainly am looking in by far the most obvious place. The place that's under everyone's nose.

But again were the guns used in most of these shootings illegally accquired? The answer is no

[Letters]

A bit like Wenger then... outdated and not in touch with the modern era...

If you like...

[Niall_Quinn]

But again were the guns used in most of these shootings illegally accquired? The answer is no

The ones people are protesting against, for this stage of the agenda, were all illegally modified. ALLEGEDLY. Because the story we have heard so far is a complete fabrication. So who knows?

[Niall_Quinn]

But realistically speaking, is there a need to have a gun to arm yourself against the state? All seems very far fetched and Hollywood movieish to me

That's what Hollywood is there for, to make you think what is going on under your nose is fantasy. That and to rape kids. Another "conspiracy theory" that nobody is laughing about any more.

[Cripps]

Sceptical and cynical NQ

[Letters]

The ones people are protesting against, for this stage of the agenda, were all illegally modified. ALLEGEDLY. Because the story we have heard so far is a complete fabrication. So who knows?

What is the agenda?
What is the basis for stating it is a fabrication?

[Niall_Quinn]

What is the agenda?
What is the basis for stating it is a fabrication?

No. Rewind. Following your consideration of the alleged facts that have so far been revealed, do you find the proposed story credible or not? We don't need to consider agendas at all to determine if the alleged facts are credible. Unless we want to skip past the alleged facts, that is.

[Letters]

NQ in evading simple question shock exclusive.
What facts are you disputing and what is your basis for doing so?

[Niall_Quinn]

NQ in evading simple question shock exclusive.
What facts are you disputing and what is your basis for doing so?

NQ is evading nothing. If you want to say, "I don't have a fucking clue about any of this, I just assume it is all as reported, but please enlighten me if that's not the case", then I'll answer your pre-emptive criticism which you have disguised as a question.