There's now a price on Putin's head
https://www.newsweek.com/wanted-dead...s-head-1684337
There's now a price on Putin's head
https://www.newsweek.com/wanted-dead...s-head-1684337
Originally Posted by GP
Finally some good news, eh NQ?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-60617365
Why good news? Are you implying I'm the one who supports censorship, rather than you? I want the BBC shut down in its current format because it's a criminal act to extort money from people who don't want it. But I have never suggested they shouldn't be allowed to keep peddling their propaganda. However, it's nice to see you finally, after all this time, mention censorship. If I had to guess I'd say you didn't have the courage to openly condemn it, given your support for censorship in the past, so you used another "joke" to make certain implications about me.
So, to be clear, for the hundredth time at least, I don't support any form of censorship under any circumstances.
As for the article itself, well, anyone can see through such childish propaganda, ironically used to criticise Russian propaganda. Both exist, of course, but the sheer arrogance of the BBC as it refers to, "Access to accurate, independent information", is typically stupefying. This from the same organisation that pushed every western war, sold the lies about WMD and Russiagate, and cosseted Saville, to name a few. Nobody with an ounce of sense pays any attention.
That said, I wonder how far the BBC would get if it decide to oppose the British state? In Russia they can declare their political view and walk off they air. Implying they were on the air in the first place. Is it in any way conceivable the BBC would have staunchly opposed the war in Iraq, to the point of walking off the air? The possibility is 0.0%
And that's the real joke in all of this. The BBC itself.
Für eure Sicherheit
Dear God you're up tight.
Perhaps. But I am not trivial and I have sufficient nerve to stab people in the front.
Für eure Sicherheit
“A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men”
And being violent is not something one should be proud about.
Now who's being uptight? Violence? You initiate these spats yet also insist on appointing yourself the moral arbiter. That degree of two-facedness is almost as extreme as your hysterical attempt to exaggerate a variation on a common saying into a violent intention. A little nonsense may be relished, but incessant duplicity goes beyond that into something far more calculated.
And all the while, the initial response is buried deeper.
Für eure Sicherheit
A word from the forgotten people of this war, the non-people, the East Ukrainians who have suffered ongoing losses at the hands of their so-called countrymen in the laughably described democratic nation of Ukraine. Where were the flags and mindless chants when these Ukrainians were being slaughtered?
Für eure Sicherheit
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
